Guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I will also have to change my above statement, as I have actually had my T5 higher than 10" off the water, when I first got it. There was NO shimmer effect at all, AND there was a vast reduction in light penetration. I suppose it's possible that I didn't have enough surface disturbance, to create shimmer, but I did have almost 5000 gph of flow, in a 75. Thus, I lowered the light, to increase penetration. Shimmer is caused by a "Point Source" lighting. Fluorescent lighting is a diffused source. This is why a lot of people have added aftermarket "spot" lights, to create the shimmer effect, while using T5HO.
About a year ago, I read a great thread, about someone using "track lighting" to get an awesome shimmer effect, while using VHO fluorescents. The accents created were amazing, and the cost was very low. I'll try to find that thread!!
Anyway, as the thread was meant to show the alternative view of T5 vs MH, I do agree that T5s are quickly replacing MH lighting, in all types of industrial uses. A lot of schools are also going this route, in gymnasiums. Granted the measurements of Candle Power, on the floors of these facilities, is averaged, so doesn't really show a true candle power, from directly under the MH, to 2-3' out, which is what we'd need in our tanks. However, it does show an overall trend to move away from MH and towards T5s. I don't know if it'll ever fully catch on in reefkeeping. However, I'm sold on T5HO, and will continue to praise them, to whomever will listen....lol.