Ichthys
Well-known member
I have a question or two that I would like answered by a member of RF Staff. I have wondered about this for some time but finally decided to ask in light of the recent group buy discussion. I understand the enforcement of the group buy only from Sponsor issue and am not talking about that subject, but something somewhat similar. This may be long winded so please bare with me.
First my motivation in asking is not to start a debate or cause trouble, I want to make sure that I do not create posts in the future that violate RF rules.
Second, I have read the stickies and TOS and User Agreements and did not find the answer to my question. That is not to say the answer is not there somewhere, just that I in my ADOS state was unable to find it.
So to best frame my question I shall illustrate a possible scenario:….
OP posts a question about water quality of source water. Respondent 1 posts that he can find RODI water at LFS or local supermarkets. Respondent 2 posts that OP should invest in a RODI unit because they are cost effective and less hassle than running to the LFS every week. Respondent 3 posts that a LFS (who is a sponsor of RF) has a nice RODI unit for x price. Respondent 4 posts that a similar RODI unit can be purchased from an online supplier (that is NOT a RF Sponsor) for less than X price.
1) Is Respondent 4’s post a violation? Directing business away from a sponsor and to an outside vendor that has a similar product for a better price?
2) Would it be a violation if they included a hyperlink to the online store where product can be sold?
Next question:….
OP asks for opinions on skimmers for his new 30 gallon reef tank. Respondent 1 posts saying what has worked well for them. Respondent 2 posts that Porsche Skimmer model X9000 is awesome and is also the product of one of RF sponsors and a great buy. Respondent 3 posts that Porsche skimmers are substandard and ABC Pyramid skimmers are much better and includes a link to ABC Skimmers website, although ABC is not an RF Sponsor.
Is Respondent 3’s post a violation?
Rather than continue with more questions and slight variations, I shall eagerly await an answer from RF Staff before continuing.
First my motivation in asking is not to start a debate or cause trouble, I want to make sure that I do not create posts in the future that violate RF rules.
Second, I have read the stickies and TOS and User Agreements and did not find the answer to my question. That is not to say the answer is not there somewhere, just that I in my ADOS state was unable to find it.
So to best frame my question I shall illustrate a possible scenario:….
OP posts a question about water quality of source water. Respondent 1 posts that he can find RODI water at LFS or local supermarkets. Respondent 2 posts that OP should invest in a RODI unit because they are cost effective and less hassle than running to the LFS every week. Respondent 3 posts that a LFS (who is a sponsor of RF) has a nice RODI unit for x price. Respondent 4 posts that a similar RODI unit can be purchased from an online supplier (that is NOT a RF Sponsor) for less than X price.
1) Is Respondent 4’s post a violation? Directing business away from a sponsor and to an outside vendor that has a similar product for a better price?
2) Would it be a violation if they included a hyperlink to the online store where product can be sold?
Next question:….
OP asks for opinions on skimmers for his new 30 gallon reef tank. Respondent 1 posts saying what has worked well for them. Respondent 2 posts that Porsche Skimmer model X9000 is awesome and is also the product of one of RF sponsors and a great buy. Respondent 3 posts that Porsche skimmers are substandard and ABC Pyramid skimmers are much better and includes a link to ABC Skimmers website, although ABC is not an RF Sponsor.
Is Respondent 3’s post a violation?
Rather than continue with more questions and slight variations, I shall eagerly await an answer from RF Staff before continuing.