My New UV and Why I added it.

Reef Aquarium & Tank Building Forum

Help Support Reef Aquarium & Tank Building Forum:

dngspot

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 7, 2006
Messages
82
I once used an 8 watt UV on my 150g tank, when it was freshwater, heck that was over five years ago. I had the little white critters, about the size of a pin head that grew so fast that they made the water hazy. I hooked that little guy up and by morning the tank was clear. That little 8 watt uv with a Danner 90 gph pump cleared a 150g tank in less than 12 hours of what ever those little swimming guys were. From that time forward I was sold on UV's,
When I moved on to salt water I left the little guy on the tank. I soon had a problem with velvet and lost fish after fish. My little 8 watt was not enough for the tough parasite, I thought. So I got a 30 watt UV, with out the crystal, and put it in, still no luck. That lesson was learned quick UV does not solve a parasite problem; it may help prevent it but, does not solve one that is in full bloom. At least this is how it is in my tank.
One thing I can say is. After all of the nasty algae’s that one can have in a fresh tank, with a UV my tank never saw an issue. When I moved on to my 210g I removed the UV and for a wile all was good, or so I thought. Soon enough the hair algae started. I must add that I do have a much stronger light system now than then, but all light bulbs were new. Some may question my water quality, I can say when the algae was about the size of a pencil eraser, my water quality was as good as a test kit would testify. There was no measurable Phosphate or Nitrate.
For the longest time I kept asking what changed, new lights, bigger fuge, calcium reactor and a skimmer. Lights could have been a factor but I would chance that they were slight because they were new. Larger fuge should have helped reduce the nutrients HA takes up. A calcium reactor can give a favorable environment because of the CO2 that is injected into the water and plants like that. And a skimmer should have been nothing but a positive thing. So I started to turn stuff off. Nothing would change, the HA flourished. I even suspected my RODI. I thought I may have introduced Phosphate after letting the DI resin go too long. As soon as I saw the small patches of HA I went into recover mode and fixed anything that was questionable and the DI was one of them. By the time I gave up the TDS meter never left 0, and you could have brushed the HA with a broom. Even today I still do not know why or how it started but I know what changed. The UV was one of the items that was removed.
So back to the subject, I removed the 30 watt UV right before the HA outbreak. So in my mind it may have been one thing that kept my tank HA clear. I have no solid proof of this but again how could it hurt to put one back in service?
A fellow offered one on my local site and I took him up on it. It was a Rainbow Lifeguard QL-80. Not really being familiar with Rainbows products, I went to take a look. It was huge and well built so I bought it. It has two separate towers, each housing a 40 watt bulb. I ordered 2 new bulbs and tested, all worked great. Today I finished installing it.
I plumed it in on the sump pump line back into the display. I was going to plum it into one side but thought if there is a problem with bacteria reduction I can turn one light off instead.
Currently I am working out a problem with Dinoflagellates and a few of my fish have ich. I am eager to see if this thing will help.
Here is a couple pics of the Dinoflagellate problem. It seems to like to sit on the sand like Cyno but, one of the differences in the two is Dinoflagellate has air bubbles on top of the mats. Dinoflagellates are much more difficult to solve than Cyno, that is my luck.
DSCF00076.JPG

DSCF00085.JPG

Here is a pic of the UV sterilizer. The second tower is right behind the one in view. For referance, my stand is 41 inches tall, the reactor is about 4 inches taller.
DSCF00103.JPG
 
You will get some benefit to your current issue but not alot. I am a fan of UV and it will help you a ton in pathagens and simular (I have four of those puppys on my tank) just make sure the flow going through it is correct, that makes a big difference. UV works by killing microbes and simular that pass through it. Mut that doesnt remove them, just kills them, from thier they will just float away and break down in the water. it would help if the unit is just in front of the skimmer, that way the skimmer might skim out the died ones.

good luck

Mike
 
It is my understanding that these guys are rated for 3000 gph. I am using a Velocity T4 to push water through them. The Velocity sees about 12.33 feet of head and that calculates to about 947 gph. If I apply 20 gph to each watt then that comes out to 1600. I would be supprized if anything makes it out of them alive.
As for the skimmer, both the Velocity and my skimmer pump, Panworld 150PS, pull from the same end of the sump, that means what ever dies will have to go through my display and sump before it would see the skimmer. Not an option to change that arrangment. One postitive note is my skimmer is a Beckett skimmer that pulls 50 scfh and does a great job.
 
Back
Top