Last night I found a post I typed up back in 2008 about Kalk reactors vs. Calcium reactors. It seems over the last couple years people have been trending back toward the old fashioned Two part dosing method via dosing pumps. (Two part = Part A, Calcium; Part B, Alkalinity; and Part C, Magnesium)
A lot of reefers don't know that Part A can be made cheaply with ice melter products such as "driveway heat" for example.
Part B is simply Baking soda. Soda ash cooked in the oven for recipe 1 or left alone for recipe 2.
Part C is a combination of Magnesium sulfate (epsom salt) and Magnesium Chloride. Not off the shelf. Bulk reef supply is one supplier that immediately to mind. For occasional dosing I just use Mg sulfate.
So, Here is a quick recap of what I posted years ago, I would like some reefers to help add the pro's and con's of the two part if you have any input
I guess I should add that I keep two part on hand at most times for adjusting my chemistry when things start to get a bit off. I add it to my make up water to bring the levels of IO up to where I like to keep my reef tank.
Here is my favorite chemistry calculator. http://reef.diesyst.com/flashcalc/flashcalc.html
A lot of reefers don't know that Part A can be made cheaply with ice melter products such as "driveway heat" for example.
Part B is simply Baking soda. Soda ash cooked in the oven for recipe 1 or left alone for recipe 2.
Part C is a combination of Magnesium sulfate (epsom salt) and Magnesium Chloride. Not off the shelf. Bulk reef supply is one supplier that immediately to mind. For occasional dosing I just use Mg sulfate.
So, Here is a quick recap of what I posted years ago, I would like some reefers to help add the pro's and con's of the two part if you have any input
"trido" said:A kalk reactor:
Raises your Ph
Is limited to evaporation
Known to help remove PO4
Can potentially nuke your tank if something goes wrong
Needs to be refilled every so often. Mine requires about once a month but its very small
A Ca reactor:
Lowers Ph
Is known to add PO4
doesnt depend on evaporation
can be set up with a controller and almost forgotten about.
With a high Ca. demand system most reefers quickly outgrow a Kalk reactor.
Some reefers refuse to use a Kalk reactor due to the risk of nuking involved. I however, feel that if failsafes are in place, its almost impossible.
Some reefers use both reactors to help offset the negatives of the other. You can definately get away with one or the other in most cases. I use both for the offsets and it also allows me to be a bit lazy when I notice one of the reactor not performing up to par. As a matter of fact. Id better go fill my kalk, its been empty for four days. Im sure my Dkh and Ca. are creeping down this week.
If you were to use only one, I would recommend the Ca reactor for sure.
Im sure there are a few more pros and cons but that pretty much sums it up.
I guess I should add that I keep two part on hand at most times for adjusting my chemistry when things start to get a bit off. I add it to my make up water to bring the levels of IO up to where I like to keep my reef tank.
Here is my favorite chemistry calculator. http://reef.diesyst.com/flashcalc/flashcalc.html
Last edited: