Hi all
I know a few of you have been paitently waiting for my follow-up on PaulB's alsphalt samples...here is some preliminary work I've done on it and some of my (and other's) theories....
I recieved about a half a lb. or so from Paul...on intial inspection, it came somewhat broken up...several small pieces...it was very brittle to the touch, and crumbles easily by hand, indicating the bitumenous binders have lost almost all their cohesive strength. I dried the samples back at room temperature for several months to remove most of the moisture, then in our lab oven to remove 100% of it, so we could get 100% dry weights on the samples. I did the same with samples of Fiji, Gulf and Florida aquacultured rock, and also some 10 year old waste asphalt pavement, so I can get a very accurate measure of density in lbs./ft.3 on all the samples for comparison...I'll post those results once we get done with the saturation/displacement measurements...Just looking at the 100% dry weights, however, this stuff is much more dense lb. for lb. than the 3 LR samples...
while drying Pauls asphalt back, I showed the samples to several lab techs that work with me, their opinions on it were all pretty consistant and may explain why this stuff hasn't killed Paul's tank yet...:lol: (which fresh asphalt definatley would... )
First I asked them how it was possible for this stuff to survive submerged in salt water for 50 years ( I believe that is how old Paul stated it probably was...correct me if I'm mistaken...) and still be in one piece...what they said was back then, oil refinement techniques and standards were lower, thus you had a less refined petroleum product going into the mix design compared to today's standards. And what engineers are finding is that the less refined products actually make a STRONGER bitumenous base for asphalt. IE the older stuff is stronger and less reactive than today's asphalts. On reactivity, they all said there would be no point in exposing it (Pauls samples) to reactivity tests, since, other than a freeze/thaw test, it has already been exposed to conditions we test for (salt water primarily) for a long period of time, any reactivity is long since happened and would likely show no change.
Then I asked them about it releasing nasty stuff into the water. They pointed out that visually, the bitumenous binders had pretty well plasticized by now, most of the reactive volitile stuff is no longer there. And this is obvious when looking at it...the binders are very rigid, glossy, brittle, like plastic. Most said the concern with releasing nasties would be with the aggregate itself used to make the asphalt...as the binders plasticized, they receeded from the aggregate, exposing it. The aggregate could be almost anything, depending on where it was quarried. It may contain metals, industrial contaminants, and who knows what else depending on where it came from.
So thus far...I still can't endorse asphalt for reef use...:lol: while Paul may have stumbled across a particular collection that is no longer leeching petroleum products...this stuff is still pretty dense, and not very strong, not a good base at all...and who knows what that aggregate is made of...and fresh asphalt is totally out of the question...
I'll post the densities when we complete them, hopefully this week...
MikeS
I know a few of you have been paitently waiting for my follow-up on PaulB's alsphalt samples...here is some preliminary work I've done on it and some of my (and other's) theories....
I recieved about a half a lb. or so from Paul...on intial inspection, it came somewhat broken up...several small pieces...it was very brittle to the touch, and crumbles easily by hand, indicating the bitumenous binders have lost almost all their cohesive strength. I dried the samples back at room temperature for several months to remove most of the moisture, then in our lab oven to remove 100% of it, so we could get 100% dry weights on the samples. I did the same with samples of Fiji, Gulf and Florida aquacultured rock, and also some 10 year old waste asphalt pavement, so I can get a very accurate measure of density in lbs./ft.3 on all the samples for comparison...I'll post those results once we get done with the saturation/displacement measurements...Just looking at the 100% dry weights, however, this stuff is much more dense lb. for lb. than the 3 LR samples...
while drying Pauls asphalt back, I showed the samples to several lab techs that work with me, their opinions on it were all pretty consistant and may explain why this stuff hasn't killed Paul's tank yet...:lol: (which fresh asphalt definatley would... )
First I asked them how it was possible for this stuff to survive submerged in salt water for 50 years ( I believe that is how old Paul stated it probably was...correct me if I'm mistaken...) and still be in one piece...what they said was back then, oil refinement techniques and standards were lower, thus you had a less refined petroleum product going into the mix design compared to today's standards. And what engineers are finding is that the less refined products actually make a STRONGER bitumenous base for asphalt. IE the older stuff is stronger and less reactive than today's asphalts. On reactivity, they all said there would be no point in exposing it (Pauls samples) to reactivity tests, since, other than a freeze/thaw test, it has already been exposed to conditions we test for (salt water primarily) for a long period of time, any reactivity is long since happened and would likely show no change.
Then I asked them about it releasing nasty stuff into the water. They pointed out that visually, the bitumenous binders had pretty well plasticized by now, most of the reactive volitile stuff is no longer there. And this is obvious when looking at it...the binders are very rigid, glossy, brittle, like plastic. Most said the concern with releasing nasties would be with the aggregate itself used to make the asphalt...as the binders plasticized, they receeded from the aggregate, exposing it. The aggregate could be almost anything, depending on where it was quarried. It may contain metals, industrial contaminants, and who knows what else depending on where it came from.
So thus far...I still can't endorse asphalt for reef use...:lol: while Paul may have stumbled across a particular collection that is no longer leeching petroleum products...this stuff is still pretty dense, and not very strong, not a good base at all...and who knows what that aggregate is made of...and fresh asphalt is totally out of the question...
I'll post the densities when we complete them, hopefully this week...
MikeS