Ok so let me know if I'm gathering this right. You get algae, and diatom blooms due to excessive nutrients they depend on. Phosphate, nitrate, and nitrite. But if they are registering at 0. Then the arrow more points to the water source, meaning silactates? But if my source of water is ro/di water. What would the issue be then. And I understand that it could be the new tank cycle. This is more directed towards future issues if they arise
HTC tapatalk
Ok...So if you have algae in your tank and you run some tests and your nitrate and phosphate results come back zero, that doesn't mean you have zero nitrates or phosphates. All that means is it is bound up in the algae that is using it for it's growth. As they are made available to the algae, the algae quickly consumes it so you will read zero nitrates and even phosphates thinking you don't have, but it's just bound up in the algae. So this is where we go back to refugiums again. People will set up a little fuge with an algae in in like chaeto for example to out-compete any other algae in the tank for the available nutrients. As the ball of chaeto grows by binding up the excess nutrients in the water, you trim it back and remove some of the algae out of your tank which exports these excess nutrients out of your system. By doing it this way, you don't have to look at the un-sightly bush of algae growing in your tank. As your tank matures, you may notice the algae will grow less and less because the bacteria that is responsible for dealing with nitrates will eventually multiply and be able to convert them itself and therefore leaving nothing for the algae to feed on so it stops growing. So don't let the test kits fool you. If algae is growing, then the food source is there... You just can't test for it because the algae is using it up so quickly for it's growth.
Here is a personal example/experience of mine. I set up my tank. After I completed the initial cycle, got rid of diatoms etc, I started to get hair algae and cyno growing in my tank. I tested my water and was reading 10 ppm of nitrates. I HATE the look of algae in my tank and so I got a light suitable for plant growth with more watts per gal than the tank had on it which I ran for more hours a day than the lights on the tank (which was placed in my fuge section of my sump) and guess what happened? The algae stopped growing in my tank and started growing in my sump. Why? Because the conditions down there were more favorable for it to grow there. Every week when doing a water change, I would get in there with my H.O.T Magnum canister filter with a polishing cartridge in it and suck out all of the algae. By the next week, it all grew back. I repeated this every week exporting the bound up nitrates and phosphates along with the algae. As time progressed and my tank matured, the algae in the sump grew less and less until eventually, I couldn't get it to grow anymore. The bacteria in my tank along with just my regular tank maintenance, skimming and I guess the use of my phosban reactor was enough to keep my nitrates at zero so I took the light off of my sump and never used it ever again.
Here is a picture of a new cartridge next to one after just one cleaning of my sump.
I lost a lot of pictures when my computer crashed, but atleast you can see where I had the fuge section. Where you see the light in the center of the sump is where the algae grew. This shot was taken when I first added the light
Here's a shot with some starting to grow in that chamber. By the end of the week, it got so bad in there that you couldn't see in there that well. It grew all over the walls and floor of the sump. This picture was probably taken about 2 days after a cleaning.
Uploaded with
ImageShack.us
Lastly, here's what the tank looked like. As you can see...No algae. All grew in the sump.