Plumbing design and questions.

Reef Aquarium & Tank Building Forum

Help Support Reef Aquarium & Tank Building Forum:

Solov

Ez reefer
Joined
Nov 11, 2003
Messages
115
Location
Bothell, WA
As I'm getting closer to finish polishing tank sides and to begin drilling for plumbing, I have a lot of questions coming up and I would appreciate your advice and help a lot!

I'll get tank plan and tentative plumbing design up for criticism in a bit, meanwhile I have a question:

How do you calculate MAX flow that your overflow box can drain? I mean the possible flow through grate part?

What I got from RC calculator for 1800gph is:

27 inch overflow length!!! :shock:

And 1.75" drain pipe diameter...

Which means, if it's true, it's hardly possible to have that kind of flow in my tank :(
 
Is this the 75 gallon? If so, you sure can turn over that much water. In fact I'd shoot for well placed 3600. Thats 48 times per hour and of course it will alway be less than you hoped for. Its alot easier to turn it down than raise it it up.

Don
 
I think I didn't say it right.

The problem that I see is not with a lot of flow, but rather with not enough flow that my overflow box can get (the amount of water that comes in through grate of overflow box per hour).

As for max flow Don, I agree that I should add closed loop on top of that 1800 from sump (1400) and refugium (400).
 
Here're pictures:

Top view:
315tank_top0.jpg


Front view:
315tank_front0.jpg


So basically, I have false back with 4.5" in between.

Sections as I plan them:
1) Overflow (planning to drill bottom and install stand pipe)
2) Media section (carbon, phosphate sponge etc.)
3) Heater section
4)-6) Refugium (might put bio-balls in first section, not sure yet - advice?)
7) Return pump (400 gph to have 20x turn over in refugium as Anthony suggests ;) ).

So... questions:
- Where should I put closed loop?
- How can I calculate flow, so it's enough for both - overflow and refugium?
- Or should I isolate 1) and 2) and make grate on 2) (kinda separate overflow going to refugium)?
- Other thoughts?

Thank you for your help!
- Alex.
 
Hey Alex, you have enough drain for the tank no problem, you dont want alot of return pump as it will make it to fast through the sump.Or is thier a sump??. Skip the bio balls they will just be trouble down the road.

Close loops are tough with tanks like this, the only way to truely do it is to come up from the bottom.


Mike
 
mojoreef said:
Hey Alex, you have enough drain for the tank no problem, you dont want alot of return pump as it will make it to fast through the sump.Or is thier a sump??.
Yes there definately will be a sump. 20 or 30 Gal one I'm thinking right now (does this sound right?). Then what power of return pump do you think is good for a tank like this?

Also, am I correct thinking that stand pipe will have to be the same height as divider between refugium and overflow, in order to get water flowing into both?

Close loops are tough with tanks like this, the only way to truely do it is to come up from the bottom.
What about going over top? To me it sounds like less trouble... Only question would be where to put intake. :rolleyes: Or did you mean that just intake should be on the bottom (also in this case it should be inside the main tank space)?
I suppose even 1/2" intakes won't fit to those 1" that I have on each side without false back?
 
Oh, and by the way - what's the best place to shop for plumbing accessories (bulkheads, valves, connectors etc.), tubes etc.?
 
I got everything pretty much figured out, except one thing - where do you plumb chiller?

If I Tee it off return pump and Tee return from it back to the same pipe a little higher - will it work?
315ChillerPlumbing.JPG
 
Hey Alex, the return pump should be just enough to return the water, dont worry about getting it to be apart of the over all water flow plan, let the CL take care of that. So any type of mag would work.
The stand pipe should be the height of the water level you want to have. so in your case, with the back of the tank they way the looks you wont need one.
The plumbing for the chiller should work as you have designed it, just make sure you are not pulling water out of the sump to fast or you will have bubbles. Also a chiller likes slower flow, so keep that in mind.

Ever thought of just removing the false back???



Mike
 
mojoreef said:
Ever thought of just removing the false back???


That is what I would do. Or use a different tank, then you can have a proper sump below the tank.
 
Well... I plan to use both - sump bellow the tank and refugium on the back.

mojoreef said:
Hey Alex, the return pump should be just enough to return the water, dont worry about getting it to be apart of the over all water flow plan, let the CL take care of that. So any type of mag would work.
Okay, Mag7 should do it then (there going to chiller and lots of elbows since I plan to have it going over top into false back and then through bulkhead at the bottom to main tank). Right now I plan to put return output into a spraybar at the bottom.

The stand pipe should be the height of the water level you want to have. so in your case, with the back of the tank they way the looks you wont need one.
Umm... I think if I don't put it, then I won't have anything going from overflow to refugium part.

Ever thought of just removing the false back???
It wouldn't worth the effort I think (easier to get new tank ;) ), so I'll learn on this tank and use this knowledge on bigger one later on :D

Here's a plan of connecting sump bellow the tank.
315Plumbing.jpg

To show the idea I rotated 90 degrees the return line going over top of the tank into false back and through bulkhead to the tank where it becomes spray bar.
 
Last edited:
Ok so I am trying to understand this. you are using both the back compartment and a sump below. So how does water get from the refugium back to the tank?? If you are using both thier might be a bit of a problem getting water both to the sump and the refuge, but answer the first question and we can go from thier.
On the chiller just have the return pump directly to it, and then run the line from the chiller directly to the tank.
On the return line I wouldnt have it go to a spray bar. Have the sump return water goup high, use the CL for the lower flow, less risky on back syphon.



mike
 
mojoreef said:
Ok so I am trying to understand this. you are using both the back compartment and a sump below. So how does water get from the refugium back to the tank??
Oh.. right, my bad, I forgot to tell that there's a hole in chamber 7 (I drew a circle in front view where it is), so it supposed to have small pump returning water to the tank (I'm thinking of 400gph pump).

If you are using both thier might be a bit of a problem getting water both to the sump and the refuge, but answer the first question and we can go from thier.
Yeah, that's why I was thinking of separating completely (right now they are connected by 2 inches of space on top) and cut some overflow-like grate on chamber 2 too.

On the chiller just have the return pump directly to it, and then run the line from the chiller directly to the tank.
But then I won't be able to easily disconnect chiller if I need to, will I?

On the return line I wouldnt have it go to a spray bar. Have the sump return water goup high, use the CL for the lower flow, less risky on back syphon.
Umm... I think you're right, for some reason I was thinking that going over top would secure me from back syphon :oops: but with pipe filled with water, it shouldn't make any difference whether it's over top or straight from bottom, right? (where's my course of physics... :rolleyes: ).

The reason I wanted to make it to spray was - it'll be permanent current, which ok for spray, but will interfere with waves if put on top.

It should be no problem to use larger pump (Mag 18?) on CL and Tee part of it to spray bar and rest put through SCWD. I'll input my CL plan to computer now...
 
Last edited:
Didn't realize this would be so long, it took a while to write but I hope it helps.

Hey Solov,

Solov said:
As for max flow Don, I agree that I should add closed loop on top of that 1800 from sump (1400) and refugium (400).
Firstly, maybe you just got your pump figures mixed up but a mag 7 will only give you 700gph at 0 head pressure (remember more head pressure will decrease you gph, as will elbows). Also find out how much head pressure your chiller will add, it might not be much but it could. The guys at marine depot told me about 1ft for the jbj that I will be getting next week :).

Solov said:
What I got from RC calculator for 1800gph is:
27 inch overflow length!!!
And 1.75" drain pipe diameter...
Secondly, the calculator you used on RC is assuming that all the water is going thru the drain below the tank which is not the case with what you are doing. If you want 1400gph going thru the drain pipe down to the sump you have to put in a drain pipe diameter for it. Now let me touch on the overflow length part because I think this is also important with your baffles in the sump which I will talk about later. The longer your overflow length (meaning going from left to right or horizontal distance) the easier the water can flow over the side of the overflow or thru the grating (you want enough grating openings as to not impede the water flow). This has nothing to do with the way the water exits thru the drain pipe/standpipe. So what do I mean by easier flow, well say you have a certain amount of water volume..for example 10 gallons. And this water is being sucked thru some sort of a channel or waterway. The narrower the channel, the higher the water height and velocity going thru it. So if you have a wide channel the water will be able travel slower, be less turbulent, and water height will be shorter (though the latter is more important with baffles). So the recommended overflow length, while it is important, once you know why its important I'm sure you can work around it.

So I will assume now that you will be using a return pump from the sump at around 1400gph (you can use a mag 18 but you will have to redirect some of the flow back into the sump).

Solov said:
But then I won't be able to easily disconnect chiller if I need to, will I?
As for the chiller you can't do it the way you are trying to do it. What you are doing is giving the water a chance to go into both the inlet and outlet of the chiller (giving the chiller a lot of back pressure) and i'm not sure what sorta flow you would get thru it. You also couldn't control the flow going into the chiller, although a gate valve could change that you still have to worry about backpressure. You should first look and see what type of gph can go thru it, you don't want it too fast because it won't cool efficiently because of lack of contact time with the water but you don't want it too slow either because the water could freeze. If you main concern is removing it then you could plump it inline with you CL with some unions and when you take the chiller out, you would have to turn off your CL. But what I think you will probably want to do is tee off either your CL line or your sump return line with some gate valves and run one of the tee outlets to the tank or whatever and the other into your chiller and then run you chiller outlet directly to the tank, which is what I think is recommended. The chiller is more efficient when the water from it is being returned directly into the tank (as opposed to back in the sump - for example with the extra 400gph from a mag 18). If I was you (although I'm not doing this myself :) ) I would put the chiller on the CL line. Because the CL line is just inherently less dangerous of overflowing or drying out, and you don't have to worry about microbubbles (which I will talk about in a sec). By the way, the chiller can still have flow going thru it when its turned off. Its just not chilling the water anymore.

Solov said:
Umm... I think you're right, for some reason I was thinking that going over top would secure me from back syphon :oops: but with pipe filled with water, it shouldn't make any difference whether it's over top or straight from bottom, right? (where's my course of physics... :rolleyes: ).
Yeah on a CL this doesn't matter but with the sump return its crucial to worry about this. You can still have your sump return go low if you have a way to break the siphon. If your going over the back with the return then you can drill a small hole (1/16 in) near the water surface in the pipe. This will break the syphon when the water drains down to it. I wouldn't put it above the water because air can get in causing bubbles and the small water that drains out the hole will sound like a trickle.

Now I go on to a very very important issue, Microbubbles. With that sort of flow going into the sump (1400 gph) it will churn up a lot of bubbles no matter what configuration you will have the water entering the sump. If you don't design the sump correctly, the only thing that will save you is filter socks or filter pads plus foam blocks. To avoid that try to design you sump with the following in mind if you can. Kevinpo actually talked to me about this before I did my sump but I couldn't so I use filter pads now lol. Remember a while back :) when I talked about water going over the overflow wall. Well the same applies to water going over baffles. The point of the baffles is to get rid of the air bubbles by allowing air to travel up to the surface and pop or hit the wall of the baffle while going over it and pop. The faster the water is going the less chance it will pop when it goes to the water surface, it will just go right over the wall. And the wall won't pop it if the water height going over the baffle is too high because the air will never come in contact with the wall (the bubbles will be reduced but not by much). As I said before the water height of the water flowing over the baffle and its velocity will be determined by the gph flowing thru it and the width (depth) of the sump. The wider the sump and baffles the calmer it will be for water to flow over the baffles. So build a wide sump! My sump around 10.5 in wide with a 1600gph flow and the baffles really don't help. Kevinpo had recommended a with of around 17 or more for me, so you decided.

Solov said:
Yeah, that's why I was thinking of separating completely (right now they are connected by 2 inches of space on top) and cut some overflow-like grate on chamber 2 too.
Lastly I really thought about this and I think you would be fine as long as
1) the first baffle is the tallest baffle
2) the stand pipe is taller than the first baffle
3) the overflow walls are higher than the stand pipe (obviously but I said it anyway)

I'm not sure if my thinking is right on this one but here goes. Remember for water to go into the overflow you have to pump the water back into the tank to above the overflow wall. So your overflow gph is limited by your pumps. If you turn off your pumps the overflow will stop getting water. Now, if the refug pump is off and return pump on then the 1400 gph will just drain down your standpipe and nothing will flood because the standpipe is below the overflow wall. The refuge water level will be at the standpipe level but this will happen anyway. If your refug pump is on and return pump off then 400 will be drained into the refug and back into the tank. In this situation, nothing will flow into sump because your standpipe is higher than your first baffles and the rest of the baffles are shorter than the first. Now it gets more tricky when both pumps are on. Assuming there is no clog in the drain, the main concern here is that you will overflow your sump because you are pumping the extra 400gph into the tank and some of that water might go down to the sump when it comes back into the overflow. I don't think this can happen because the first baffle is below the standpipe. So the water will drain into the refuge area filling it before it gets to the standpipe. And as long as the walls of tank and overflow are above the standpipe, the refuge won't overflow either.

If your worried, you could just build your sump with enough room to cover your back syphon and cover the volume of the water in the refuge area so if it gets pump dry your sump will not overflow but I really don't think this will happen.

In this line of thinking I'm assuming that you are really using the baffles in the refuge as separators for the chambers and not to stop microbubbles. I don't think you will have a bubble issue there because that water isn't mixing with air like the water going down the drain. And because the water level will be above the baffle height the baffles probably won't be effective bubble stoppers.

Paul

P.S. Mojo has a lot of experience so I would trust what he tell's you.
 
Last edited:
Very nice analysis Paul! Thank you for your post.

I'm thinking along the same lines as you described, also I gave up on the idea of 1400 gph through the sump. So I'll do what Mike suggested - just enough flow to have reasonable water turn-around through the sump.

So total overflow rate will be ~400gph refug + ~600gph return from sump and chiller.

Your point about chiller totally makes sense too. Chiller return should go separetely for best results I think.
 
Solov,
No problem, I'm glad I could help. But don't give up on the high flow too quick. Its possible to have a high flow if you just plan things out correctly. If your building the sump yourself just think about bubbles in advance. You should take a look at www.barraquatic.com he has some diy threads from RC that are helpful and he builds sumps also. He did kevinpo sump that has around 4000 gph going thru it. You should also take a look at www.melevsreef.com which has some informative stuff about sumps. Goodluck
Paul
 

Latest posts

Back
Top