Krish
RF STAFF
Just posted something similar to this on a poll a few mins ago, but my opinion on slow flow through a sump versus fast flow is I think for me personally they work about the same. I've had a 75gal with about a 30 gal sump with 700 gph of flow passing through the sump and a 38 gal with about a 15 gal sump with 950 gph running through the sump. Both tanks I was able to keep un-detectable nitrates which I think had a lot to do with my diligent tank maintenance habits. I never missed a beat and stayed on top of things which I think is what helps. Where something may have fallen short, I was there to pick up the slack. I can see both sides of the coin which is being argued here though...Fast flow and your sump see's more water passing through it per hour giving things like your skimmer more chances at catching what's passing through as water makes more rounds within that hour. Then you have slow flow, which less flow passes through the sump each hour, but your skimmer is given a longer period (ie more contact time) to process water. The analogy I just made a few mins ago is I look at sump flow the same way I look at a person walking from point A to point B in the rain versus the same person running from point A to point B. Which one gets wet more?? I think it all works out about the same, but that is just my personal opinion because I never had either one (slow or fast flow through my sump) fail me. Now if I didn't maintain my tank as thoroughly as I did, then I think it is quite possible I may have seen a difference between the two. So far in my personal experience though, slow or fast worked just as well as the other, but don't take my word for it. Might have just gotten lucky and of course so many things to factor in.
Last edited: