i do agree with you, and yes that is the basic of skimming, but what if all that is archived at a high of 3' ? and no more can be done after ?
my point is a skimmer 24"/3' is suppose to outperform a 12"/6' skimmer,
Deltec, H%S and RE is claiming this, i didnt do the testing or would i be able...
i do understand how a wetneck works, but never seen one working, i guess you took the desing from schuran ?
as for 6' high skimmer, isnt that something from the past ?
Deltec did some study and figured that wider is better then high, if i remember right, one of deltec europa posted about...
Alberto, i was just giving my 2 cents, this is no competition for me either :)
maybe i should put in my sig, "Disclaimer, die hard BK fan posting here" :D
besides there is no such thing as a BK600 i am sure you like your new skimmer :)
there is a BK650 however, which is 26" in diameter ;) will be hard to outskim i would say,
"sticky thread",
IMO madison and dave should run the sticky thread, to get both opinion posted on the sticky thread, after all, the test is run by madison and dave, and not just by dave, thats how it started, i can't see a reason to change that,
skimmer facts, in dave's skimmer thread, would be nice if you could add
air / hour
bubble size
noise factor
warranty
diameter, 8" / 10" / 12"
hight
foam consistency
features (if any)
those are some main points, which are not on the "Facts"