mfinn
Surgeonfish
Hi Charlie, how's it going?
FYI, I don't think any of you are going to catch krish.
FYI, I don't think any of you are going to catch krish.
How to get to 50
- Thread starter dogfrog
- Start date
Help Support Reef Aquarium & Tank Building Forum:
- Status
Hi Charlie, how's it going?
FYI, I don't think any of you are going to catch krish.
Not a chance!!
Don't you mean 4 years 11 months? *lol*
who is counting :lol: :lol: :lol:
krisfal
Well-known member
Well said!
I cannot remember the exact quote but I read something that said those traits/actions that you most hate in others are the traits/actions you dislike in yourself.
This thread is great fun, I think I have boosted my post count considerably, I might even catch up with Adam someday!
krisfal
Well-known member
Recalculating . . . .
I got three extra posts by making a mistake... Wait is that 2? No wonder I didn't finish my engineering degree....
You can bring your posts way up just by correcting spelling, math, and grammar on every thread.
On a side note:
Maybe we can have an additional service offered, for a small fee. These consultants could review the post, check it, and discuss it with you by PM, prior to going public…
On a side note:
Maybe we can have an additional service offered, for a small fee. These consultants could review the post, check it, and discuss it with you by PM, prior to going public…
krisfal
Well-known member
Myteemouse
NOTHING
I will catch and pass you all And none of you can catch me HA HA HA HA
(insert thoughtful funny joke here, and laugh hard)
(insert thoughtful funny joke here, and laugh hard)
krisfal
Well-known member
I have no doubt you will soon pass everybody and even give Krish a run for his money, but don't get caught up in completing that tonight:badgrin:
Skimmy
SKIM FU
reefreefer
Well-known member
I look more than I post, I think I was around just a little while before they made the rule, lots of eye candy and brought back the dead, but no one seemed to mind. This site is a great resource, and the closest thing many people have to a club. I had never even seen a reef tank until I was 22, and moved away from Redding. In most smaller community's there are no stores, and not too many people are interested in reef tanks This site helps people stay in the hobby. Keep it going everyone will join!
Every one tells me there are more important thing than fish, and I say what does that have to do with Coral.
Every one tells me there are more important thing than fish, and I say what does that have to do with Coral.
reefreefer
Well-known member
O man I didn't know poor poor kitty.
dogfrog
latezonatus
Yep read it .... Has only to do with TEXTING. Now did you read it?
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.61.668
RCW 46.61.668
Sending, reading, or writing a text message while driving.
Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section, a person operating a moving motor vehicle who, by means of an electronic wireless communications device, other than a voice-activated global positioning or navigation system that is permanently affixed to the vehicle, sends, reads, or writes a text message, is guilty of a traffic infraction. A person does not send, read, or write a text message when he or she reads, selects, or enters a phone number or name in a wireless communications device for the purpose of making a phone call.
lvsuckerfish
g funk
this is to dogfrog is a forum text? yes
are you reading it while driving say pertaining to the law 9you stated you only do when loading and unloading) but yes then it is a text message thats how law enforcement will look at it is is just like if i am typing on my computer while drive same thing It is not a text but you are reading text and it is a message of some sort of another.
are you reading it while driving say pertaining to the law 9you stated you only do when loading and unloading) but yes then it is a text message thats how law enforcement will look at it is is just like if i am typing on my computer while drive same thing It is not a text but you are reading text and it is a message of some sort of another.
dogfrog
latezonatus
No this is a message via a web page and by definition is not a text message
Definitions of Text message
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text-message
Text messaging refers to the exchange of brief written messages between mobile and portable devices over cellular networks.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/text_message
A brief electronic message sent between mobile phones, containing text composed by the sender, usually input via a lettering system on a cell phone's numeric keypad, the content of which is often abbreviated like shorthand by leaving out vowels or using phonetic spellings.
Read the definitions then reread my post before Spllbnd2 made his statement about the law . Post 61 and 68.....
The intent of the law is to cover the use of cell phones. That I agree with you on. And no I am not texting while driving. I am viewing a web page. By definition I am not texting. You can make up your own definition but law is clear ( I wish) and when it is not, well that is what lawyers are for and the great argument (and big $$) begin. There is a difference that could be argued in court with a chance of winning but again the intent of the law is to stop all use of a cell phone while driving.
And my point in my post was the people were not following the intent of the posting rule.
And one more post smarter now
Definitions of Text message
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Text-message
Text messaging refers to the exchange of brief written messages between mobile and portable devices over cellular networks.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/text_message
A brief electronic message sent between mobile phones, containing text composed by the sender, usually input via a lettering system on a cell phone's numeric keypad, the content of which is often abbreviated like shorthand by leaving out vowels or using phonetic spellings.
Read the definitions then reread my post before Spllbnd2 made his statement about the law . Post 61 and 68.....
The intent of the law is to cover the use of cell phones. That I agree with you on. And no I am not texting while driving. I am viewing a web page. By definition I am not texting. You can make up your own definition but law is clear ( I wish) and when it is not, well that is what lawyers are for and the great argument (and big $$) begin. There is a difference that could be argued in court with a chance of winning but again the intent of the law is to stop all use of a cell phone while driving.
And my point in my post was the people were not following the intent of the posting rule.
And one more post smarter now
- Status
