I see. What about employing the use of crustaceans that clean the sand, and sand-sifting fish?
What's the alternative to a sand bed, finely ground coral?
dpaynter said:There is a lot of debate on this issue. Do a search on deep sand beds (DSB). Let me oversimplify and say there are three main camps.
Bare Bottom (BB)
No substrate at all - detritus is vacuumed out or there is enough turbulence to carry the detritus out the overflow and it is collected in a filter sock.
Shallow Sand Bed (SSB)
A decorative layer of sand (1 inch or so) - this is not deep enough to maintain a live sand bed; detritus must be vacuumed out of the sand bed periodically.
Deep Sand Bed (DSB)
4 or 5 inches (or more) of live sand. This is deep enough to develop an anaerobic layer for processing nitrates and support bacteria and microfauna in the sandbed to process detritus. There is a slow difusion of water and nutrients through the layers. You DO NOT want creatures that extensively disrupt the sand bed like some fish or sand sifting sea stars that devour the small animals that make the sand bed live. You want worms, pods, etc. living in the sand bed and creatures like nassarious snails, fighting conches, cucumbers, etc that feed off the detritus on the top of the bed.
All three camps have there proponents and successful tanks. What most would say is you do not want a layer of crushed coral on the bottom of the tank. This traps the detritus and (while it may support pods and worms) doesn't support the smaller animals to continue processing the detritus.
Thanks, this is exactly the sort of comparison I was looking for.
Previously posted by thecapn
What cons are there to a live sand substrate?
Enter your email address to join:
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join: