NaH2O
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2004
- Messages
- 8,568
I recently took the time to read a couple of articles from a few years ago by Richard Harker on nipple orientation of MH bulbs. Some hobbyists note a difference in the appearance of the bulb color when the nipple is orientated down or other position than straight up. According to the research conducted by Harker, he was unable to recreate the color shift, or a difference enough that would be visible. What do you think about this argument? Also, the argument that nipple orientation has little to do with a bulb's performance with color and intensity? Were the methods of experiment bad?
Here are the 2 articles:
Nipple Nonsense
Nipple Orientation of Metal Halide Bulbs Revisitied
Example of anectodal evidence (quotes from another thread). Do you think that the color shift Mike notes below is really from "cleaning the corrosion from the bulb contacts while attempting to reorient the bulb" as stated in the quote above? I don't think so, so how does that explain what Harker found in his research?
How does one explain the anecdotal observations such as bulbs failing to fire if the nipple is mis-positioned? First, a reef tank is a hostile environment for any electrical device, particularly one that draws a great deal of current. Corrosion can build up in the contacts and sockets of metal halide lighting. In the course of trying to reorient the nipple of a metal halide bulb, one must remove the bulb and by doing so may remove the corrosion that was preventing the bulb from firing. I have found that with an older metal halide bulb, simply unscrewing and screwing the bulb back in will enable the bulb to fire. Those who have observed a color shift when changing the orientation of the nipple may also be inadvertently cleaning the corrosion from the bulb contacts while attempting to reorient the bulb. There is a very small color temperature shift at different points around the bulb. It is possible that the small color temperature difference is more apparent when the bulb is placed next to a second bulb with a different color temperature. This would be most apparent as a bulb ages and shifts in color. In these experiments I was unable to significantly shift the color temperature of any bulb by rotating the position, but I have observed color shifts in older unstable metal halide bulbs where the arc periodically changes position. One should realize, however, that the nipple has nothing to do with the position of the arc within the envelope, and that the nipple has nothing to do with color shift.
Here are the 2 articles:
Nipple Nonsense
Nipple Orientation of Metal Halide Bulbs Revisitied
Example of anectodal evidence (quotes from another thread). Do you think that the color shift Mike notes below is really from "cleaning the corrosion from the bulb contacts while attempting to reorient the bulb" as stated in the quote above? I don't think so, so how does that explain what Harker found in his research?
mojoreef said:Try them both ways Min and see what comes of it. I have down that with ushios, iwasakis and radiums and thier is a big shift in color when the nipples are pointing down. On the ushios and iwasakis went yellow, radium darker blue.
Mike
mojoreef said:I have done it for a few reefer to watch, Basically the color of the bulb was whiter, I then turned the bulbs off waited for them to cool and then turned the nipple down. When they re-lite you could see the color difference, they turned yellow. I have done it side by side with the same temp bulb to show it.
Mike