Hey Steve I hear you, I think the folks with the most money to loose will be doing alot of fighting. As written the bill would close of multi billion dollar industry in the US, never mind the impact on our trading partners. Thier not going to go down that road with out a huge fight. MAC is try to be the orginaisation that would be in control of the whole package and is looking for the first 16 million that would be distributed, already thier very poor record is being exposed and is working against them. As mentioned prior it is to broad and to far reaching, you cant just stop an entire industry in its tracks, and put tens of thousands out of work and close thousands of companies. Not for something that impacts the reefs at such a small fraction. You have to remember that the enviromental orginisations are and industry, they are alot of them going after grant money and so on. Its a multi billion dollar industry also that impact corals and fish almost as much as we do with experimentation and so on.
Right now the bill is in desent, as in for the next year the government is allowing all who are opposed to desent on the bill, trust me thier is alot of desent going on right now (feel frre to do so yourself). then it goes to congress for vote. Again as written it is to broad and to far reaching. In the bill they are looking for an orginisation to overlook the whole ball of wax. The group will say what is sustainable and what isnt, what you can hae and what you cannot. Well thier is already an internation group doing this in almost all collection countries and in almost all importation countries. That group is called Cities and the US has signed treaties with them, they have the resourses and knowledge base already in place. So why would the government take the impact cost of what is already i place and being run internationally??? makes no sence in these times for sure. Under cities all the corals and fish we recieve today will stay the same
Mike
Right now the bill is in desent, as in for the next year the government is allowing all who are opposed to desent on the bill, trust me thier is alot of desent going on right now (feel frre to do so yourself). then it goes to congress for vote. Again as written it is to broad and to far reaching. In the bill they are looking for an orginisation to overlook the whole ball of wax. The group will say what is sustainable and what isnt, what you can hae and what you cannot. Well thier is already an internation group doing this in almost all collection countries and in almost all importation countries. That group is called Cities and the US has signed treaties with them, they have the resourses and knowledge base already in place. So why would the government take the impact cost of what is already i place and being run internationally??? makes no sence in these times for sure. Under cities all the corals and fish we recieve today will stay the same
Mike