now i did agree with ecobalance on the live rock live sand debate and obviously mike s said he was told that 2 decades ago so that pretty much goes your argument on a new way (if any one eles read that thread before being deleted)
Well, back then, we really didn't have access to live rock (especially in Wyoming), what we would typically do when setting up a new tank is to take several gallons of water, a used filter pad or two, and a few cups of crushed coral (which is what we used in my area back then almost exclusively as a substrate) from an existing mature tank and add them to the new tank. Then we would add a nutrient source and track the ammonia and nitrite spikes with tests. When both levels were at zero and nitrate was on the rise, we considered the tank "broke in" and ready for the first livestock addition. So really, this is fundamentally no different than adding LR and LS...you get the same results...nothing new or revolutionary about it
i to thought that alot of people not this board but people in my local communtiy are stuck in ideas that are arcaic i am open to any suggestion of new or old methods
I'm of the opinion that just because an idea has been around awhile or is considered "old school", that doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Sure, there are some methods and ideas that are no longer practiced in modern marine tank keeping...but out of the ones that have stuck around, there is usually a good reason...they work, and have been tried and true for a long period of time. I see a lot of people that try to challange old ideas and practices...which is a good thing, it helps the hobby advance and evolve...but to unilaterally dismiss old ideas and practices as a matter of course just doesn't make much sense to me. I'm always open to new ideas, and if somebody can prove to me that an old idea or practice I employ is no longer a good idea, I'm all ears.
MikeS