I wasn't going to say anything given that someone earlier already put a link to my thread, but here it goes.
I bought the XM to try because I had seen the 250 watt version on someone's tank and it looked great. Also read JB NY's study and had read Sanjay's studies too. I was running Ushios at the time, which should be the gold standard of 10,000K bulbs. The XM looked nice, but I was always very hesitant because I had read some many peple having problems with them. Manufacturer said they fixed the problem and yet you see tons of people with the same issues over and over. I did not want to deal with the inconsistancies, so I got rid of mine. If I was to go with 10,000K bulbs again, I have no doub whatsoever I would go with Ushios. Have to supplement though.
People in the hobby need to start questioning a lot of things we take as unwritten rules. Lots of unproven things we do and fight for. However, we know very little about them. I have to ask why is it that people running 175 watt bulbs get good coral growth (faster than in the ocean with sunlight). Why people running 20,000K bulbs get great colors and moderate growth (still faster than the ocean). Why people with extremely good skimmers and with no skimmers get better growth than in the ocean. What do the skimmers really take out. Does anybody have even a remote clue? A lot of these questions ahve no scientificly proven answers, but they have been answered with logic and what common sense would dictate: more light is better, more expensive skimmers are better, 6500K bulbs are best, etc. Well, sre they??
I chose to go with what people call not the best bulb with crappy PAR (radiums 400 watt) and yet I am getting good growth and awesome colors. Go figure.
:lol: :lol: