LED's has always had some big drawback, but most of those are slowly disappearing. The one that is still lingering is the cost IMHO, their is no way I could justify the cost of a premade unit just yet, BUT the DIY is right in the money even cheaper then setting up a MH system.
One thing folks have to watch for when looking to go LED is to make sure that all the things you need from light over a reef tank are met. LED's are mainly built for other industries but are starting to make their way into the reef/aquarium market, so make sure you dot your I's and cross your T's. This is what I am trying to do in this thread. I am at the point where my MH bulbs need replacing and one of my ballasts blew, so if their was ever a time this is it. So here is what I am reseaching and what I have found out so far.
>Does the LED have the par to replace my 400 watt halide = So I had tested a LED that my buddy found, and yep it is at level and might even have more par.
>Does the LED give me the kelvin rating I am looking for and that is usuable for the coral = SO far the spectral analysis I have seen is in the money
>Does the up front cost justify the purchase = In my case for sure.
>Research everywhere to find any positive and/or negative feedback = and that is what brings me to this thread, from Seth and Skimmy I have heard that their have been folks that have experence bleaching from starting with similar lights. Word was mentioned that the LED puts out to much par in the usuable range for the zoox and if care is not taken it will cause the coral to eject its zoox. So I need to know if that is just someone that hits his corals with a new strong light and did not acclimate it properly (same applies for MH) or if this truely is a case of to much par at the Pur range. SOOOOooooo If I can find what I asked for above I can do one of two things, dail it down to an acceptable range, raise the light or find out that its was just a rumor??
Mike