Yes that but what happens when one/a few or a bunch die?? then all thier mass including all they have bound to thier matrix goes back into the pot as nutrients again. Also it assumes that all food is consumed, when in reality only a percentage is. We did some experimenting a whil back where we used calculation models based on solid info from Sorokin as to the population base of fuana in lagoonal sand substraights (closest thing to a DSB set up). We were trying to figure out how many critters it would take using the Laws you listed (incuding bacteria) to reduce/bind/burn off the amount of food inputed. Even using pretty low inputs the critter population was incredable, it would have had to be almost a solid living mass of critters 6 inches deep. The stumbling block was recruitment, in our tank we only have a set amount of critters (after maturity) from thier it becomes a slow decline of most with a coming into dominance of one type of worm, bottom line a decline overall. In the wild a same size aea of sand has a huge recruitment factor where the vast majority of fuana comes from outside. It just cant be duplicate, not even close, kind of disapointing.However, do to that thermodynamic and conservation of energy deal
Thier is a simple and easy way to harvest detroviors and get about 90% of the nutrient at the same time my friend.But yes, you are right, I do need to harvest detrivoirs to make the equation ballence. I will work on thinking of a plan for that when my mind is no so sleep deprived.
Harvest the detritus???
Mike