OK, after reading this entire thread and the countless ones in RC and other places, I'll tell you my opinion as I see it. Remember, it is only an opinion and you should take it as that. So is the "experience" of thers in those posts you all reference to:
-Lowering the PO4 too fast so the coral can't handle it is the most ridiculous thing I've heard in a while. That is the environment the coral come from, spawn in, grow in, and multiply in. So how is it that all of the sudden after being in crappy water for 2-30 days while i transit before it makes it to your tank all of the suddent the good quality water its entire life has known is bad? Just kaka
-The countless heards of people with RTN are likely less than a dozen altogether. At least in the most common posts we all read. They just post the same thing 50 times, so it sounds like 200 people.
-This new products?
Rowaphos has been used in reef tanks in europe continiously for many many years. It is new to the US market though, at least to the internet masses as lots of people were using it before anyway. Very few european guys have reported problems with it at all. The minor changes in alkalinity and pH have been known, but the changes have been so subtle I can't possibly see how that is the key either. You would be usprised how many people just dump a bucket of fresh tap water daily into their tank to replace evaportion or how about the ones dosing b-ionic daily that have their levels of alk and Ca go up and down several times daily.
-Do we need something in the first place?
Yes, I don't think anyone one of us runs a tank without a single fish. Even if you did, you would still have a surplus of PO4.
-The study shows rowa is better than phosban:
Completely wrong in all counts. Months ago I read the study made for rowa where they claim it is better. Not only was the study of very poor design and extremely biased, but it really showed nothing that was statisticly significant. Bob should remember it since I forwarded it to him then. I had a discussion with Holmes-Farley about it too and he couldn't agree more in the poor design of the study and on how the test showed nothing that was statisticly significant for them to claim such superiority. The other tests done here, more specificly the Harker test, was also extremely poor to say the least. Despite the tests, you need to remember tests are not supposed to prove anything, but to rather support or not support a theory. What is proof to you may not be to me. In other words, there is nothing so far that shows convincing superiority of one over the other.
-Do the rowaphos, phosban, and the generic ferric oxides work?
You bet they do. It is also my suspicion they all work the same for our purposes and means. You need to remember this stuff was originally made and used for (still is) to purify water and remove silica and arsenic. PO4 removal is just a byproduct.
-Which should I use?
My opinion is that whichever happens to be cheaper will likely work the same for your end result. I personally have been using Phosban because it is cheaper. The moment rowa becomes the same price, I will toss a coin to decide which one.
-Should I buy the expensive Deltec reactor or run it in a bag?
If it makes you feel better and makes you believe you are doing better, by all means buy the most expensive reactor you can find. So long as you can gently move the media with the water goin through it, it does not matter what the sticker says outside. Using it in a bag is likely a huge waste of your money. Just an opinion.
I'll stop there since my fngers are hurting. :lol: :lol: